Skip to main navigation menu Skip to main content Skip to site footer

Health Review

Vol. 1 No. 3 (2023): July/September - 2023

Stroke mimics in a Brazilian stroke center: a retrospective cohort in a Brazilian stroke unit

DOI
https://doi.org/10.52600/2965-0968.bjcmr.2023.1.3.41-48
Submitted
June 4, 2023
Published
2023-07-16

Abstract

This study assessed stroke patients in a Brazilian unit to describe the prevalence, clinical presentation, etiology, and treatment outcomes of cases initially diagnosed as stroke mimics (SM). SM refers to conditions that mimic stroke but are not caused by cerebrovascular events. Misdiagnosis can lead to unnecessary and potentially harmful treatments. The study examined patients admitted between October 2012 and September 2013. Among patients with symptoms onset within four hours, 7.1% (10 patients) were classified as SM. Six of these patients received intravenous thrombolysis, a treatment for acute ischemic stroke. The main clinical presentations among SM cases were motor symptoms (90%), dysarthria, and sensory symptoms (60%). The etiology of SM cases varied, with functional disorders being the most common (60%). The findings reveal a significant percentage of patients admitted to the stroke unit were ultimately diagnosed as SM, highlighting the need for improved diagnostic strategies to differentiate between stroke and SM. The study underscores the importance of developing well-defined guidelines to assess SM risk and utilize imaging methods for distinguishing between stroke and SM. Further research is necessary to address these issues and enhance stroke diagnosis accuracy.

References

  1. Carlén M. What constitutes the prefrontal cortex? Science. 2017 Oct 27;358(6362):478-482. doi: 10.1126/science.aan8868. PMID: 29074767.
  2. Saini V, Guada L, Yavagal DR. Global Epidemiology of Stroke and Access to Acute Ischemic Stroke Interventions. Neurology. 2021;97(20 Suppl 2):S6-S16. doi: 10.1212/WNL.0000000000012781.
  3. Feigin VL, Stark BA, Johnson CO, Roth GA, Bisignano C, Abady GG, et al. Global, regional, and national burden of stroke and its risk factors, 1990–2019: A systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2019. Lancet Neurol. 2021;20(10):795-820.
  4. Feigin VL, Brainin M, Norrving B, Martins S, Sacco RL, Hacke W, et al. World Stroke Organization (WSO): Global Stroke Fact Sheet 2022. Int J Stroke. 2022 Jan;17(1):18-29. doi: 10.1177/17474930211065917. Erratum in: Int J Stroke. 2022 Apr;17(4):478.
  5. Nugem R, Bordin R, Pascal C, Schott-Pethelaz AM, Trombert-Paviot B, Piriou V, et al. Stroke Care in Brazil and France: National Policies and Healthcare Indicators Comparison. J Multidiscip Healthc. 2020;13:1403-1414. doi: 10.2147/JMDH.S262900.
  6. Kuriakose D, Xiao Z. Pathophysiology and Treatment of Stroke: Present Status and Future Perspectives. Int J Mol Sci. 2020;21(20):7609. doi: 10.3390/ijms21207609.
  7. Barthels D, Das H. Current advances in ischemic stroke research and therapies. Biochim Biophys Acta Mol Basis Dis. 2020;1866(4):165260. doi: 10.1016/j.bbadis.2018.09.012.
  8. Moulin S, Leys D. Stroke mimics and chameleons. Curr Opin Neurol. 2019;32(1):54-59. doi: 10.1097/WCO.0000000000000620.
  9. Wallace EJC, Liberman AL. Diagnostic Challenges in Outpatient Stroke: Stroke Chameleons and Atypical Stroke Syndromes. Neuropsychiatr Dis Treat. 2021;17:1469-1480. doi: 10.2147/NDT.S275750.
  10. Vilela P. Acute stroke differential diagnosis: Stroke mimics. Eur J Radiol. 2017;96:133-144. doi: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2017.05.008.
  11. Long B, Koyfman A. Clinical Mimics: An Emergency Medicine-Focused Review of Stroke Mimics. J Emerg Med. 2017;52(2):176-183. doi: 10.1016/j.jemermed.2016.09.021.
  12. Pohl M, Hesszenberger D, Kapus K, Meszaros J, Feher A, Varadi I, et al. Ischemic stroke mimics: A comprehensive review. J Clin Neurosci. 2021;93:174-182. doi: 10.1016/j.jocn.2021.09.025.
  13. Fernandes PM, Whiteley WN, Hart SR, Al-Shahi Salman R. Strokes: mimics and chameleons. Pract Neurol. 2013;13(1):21-8. doi: 10.1136/practneurol-2012-000465.
  14. Anathhanam S, Hassan A. Mimics and chameleons in stroke. Clin Med (Lond). 2017;17(2):156-160. doi: 10.7861/clinmedicine.17-2-156.
  15. Ifergan H, Amelot A, Ismail M, Gaudron M, Cottier JP, Narata AP. Stroke-mimics in stroke-units. Evaluation after changes imposed by randomized trials. Arq Neuropsiquiatr. 2020;78(2):88-95. doi: 10.1590/0004-282X20190154.
  16. Al Khathaami AM, Alsaif SA, Al Bdah BA, Alhasson MA, Aldriweesh MA, Alluhidan WA, et al. Stroke mimics: Clinical characteristics and outcome. Neurosciences (Riyadh). 2020;25(1):38-42. doi: 10.17712/nsj.2020.1.20190096.
  17. Sjöö M, Berglund A, Sjöstrand C, Eriksson EE, Mazya MV. Prehospital stroke mimics in the Stockholm Stroke Triage System. Front Neurol. 2022;13:939618. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2022.939618.
  18. H Buck B, Akhtar N, Alrohimi A, Khan K, Shuaib A. Stroke mimics: incidence, aetiology, clinical features and treatment. Ann Med. 2021;53(1):420-436. doi: 10.1080/07853890.2021.1890205.
  19. Akhtar N, Bhutta Z, Kamran S, Babu B, Jose N, Joseph S, et al. Stroke Mimics: A five-year follow-up study from the Qatar Stroke Database. J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis. 2020;29(10):105110. doi: 10.1016/j.jstrokecerebrovasdis.2020.105110.
  20. Croskerry P. The importance of cognitive errors in diagnosis and strategies to minimize them. Acad Med. 2003;78(8):775-80. doi: 10.1097/00001888-200308000-00003.
  21. Zwaan L, Monteiro S, Sherbino J, Ilgen J, Howey B, Norman G. Is bias in the eye of the beholder? A vignette study to assess recognition of cognitive biases in clinical case workups. BMJ Qual Saf. 2017;26(2):104-110. doi: 10.1136/bmjqs-2015-005014.
  22. Ely JW, Graber MA. Checklists to prevent diagnostic errors: a pilot randomized controlled trial. Diagnosis (Berl). 2015;2(3):163-169. doi: 10.1515/dx-2015-0008.
  23. Huang GC, Kriegel G, Wheaton C, Sternberg S, Sands K, Richards J, et al. Implementation of diagnostic pauses in the am-bulatory setting. BMJ Qual Saf. 2018;27(6):492-497. doi: 10.1136/bmjqs-2017-007192.
  24. Ahmad A, Islam Z, Manzoor Ahmad S, Sarfraz Z, Sarfraz A, Felix M, et al. The correlation of D-dimer to stroke diagnosis within 24 hours: A meta-analysis. J Clin Lab Anal. 2022;36(3):e24271. doi: 10.1002/jcla.24271.
  25. Yuan B, Yang T, Yan T, Cheng W, Bu X. Relationships Between D-Dimer Levels and Stroke Risk as Well as Adverse Clinical Outcomes After Acute Ischemic Stroke or Transient Ischemic Attack: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Front Neurol. 2021;12:670730. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2021.670730.
  26. Nguyen PL, Chang JJ. Stroke Mimics and Acute Stroke Evaluation: Clinical Differentiation and Complications after Intra-venous Tissue Plasminogen Activator. J Emerg Med. 2015;49(2):244-52. doi: 10.1016/j.jemermed.2014.12.072.
  27. Lumley HA, Flynn D, Shaw L, McClelland G, Ford GA, White PM, et al. A scoping review of pre-hospital technology to assist ambulance personnel with patient diagnosis or stratification during the emergency assessment of suspected stroke. BMC Emerg Med. 2020;20(1):30. doi: 10.1186/s12873-020-00323-0.

Most read articles by the same author(s)