Skip to main navigation menu Skip to main content Skip to site footer

Health Review

Vol. 3 No. 1 (2025): January/December - 2025

The Importance of the Environment as a Driver of Knowledge: Does Socio-Economic Status Matter?

DOI
https://doi.org/10.52600/2965-0968.bjcmr.2025.3.1.bjcmr35
Submitted
March 31, 2025
Published
2025-06-17

Abstract

Brain plasticity or brain reorganization is important for satisfactory cognitive activity, in which the learning process can guarantee the skills needed for full personal development. Socioeconomic status, which presents the social reality of the individual, such as educational level, income, health and neighborhood, is an important factor for learning and the anatomical characteristics of the brain to function normally. Our aim, through a narrative review, was to update the current state of the art, and in this way we carried out a wide-ranging study that discusses SES and cognition, in order to show that SES has a positive impact on learning when social conditions are favorable and a negative influence, both on brain structure and on the learning process, when social conditions are not favorable. In view of this, it is necessary to think about strategies that enable equal opportunities in the learning environment and public policies that can remedy inequalities and boost knowledge.

References

  1. Mašić V, Šečić A, Trošt Bobić T, Femec L. Neuroplasticity and Braille reading. Acta Clin Croat. 2020;59(1):147–53. doi:10.20471/acc.2020.59.01.18.
  2. Seo D, Sinha R. Neuroplasticity and predictors of alcohol recovery. Alcohol Res Curr Rev. 2015;37(1):143–52.
  3. Ho TC, King LS. Mechanisms of neuroplasticity linking early adversity to depression: developmental considerations. Transl Psychiatry. 2021;11(1):517. doi:10.1038/s41398-021-01639-6.
  4. Yoo AH, Collins AGE. How working memory and reinforcement learning are intertwined: A cognitive, neural, and com-putational perspective. J Cogn Neurosci. 2022;34(4):551–68. doi:10.1162/jocn_a_01808.
  5. Brem AK, Ran K, Pascual-Leone A. Learning and memory. Handb Clin Neurol. 2013;116:693–737. doi:10.1016/B978-0-444-53497-2.00055-3.
  6. Othman MZ, Hassan Z, Che Has AT. Morris water maze: a versatile and pertinent tool for assessing spatial learning and memory. Exp Anim. 2022;71(3):264–80. doi:10.1538/expanim.21-0120.
  7. Langensee L, Rumetshofer T, Mårtensson J. Interplay of socioeconomic status, cognition, and school performance in the ABCD sample. NPJ Sci Learn. 2024;9(1):17. doi:10.1038/s41539-024-00233-x.
  8. Feijó DM, Pires JF, Gomes RMR, Carlo EJF, Viana TNL, Magalhães JR, et al. The impact of child poverty on brain development: does money matter? Dement Neuropsychol. 2023;17:e20220105. doi:10.1590/1980-5764-DN-2022-0105.
  9. Li ZA, Cai Y, Taylor RL, Eisenstein SA, Barch DM, Marek S, et al. Associations between socioeconomic status, obesity, cog-nition, and white matter microstructure in children. JAMA Netw Open. 2023;6(6):e2320276. doi:10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2023.20276.
  10. Dennis E, Manza P, Volkow ND. Socioeconomic status, BMI, and brain development in children. Transl Psychiatry. 2022;12(1):33. doi:10.1038/s41398-022-01779-3.
  11. D'Angiulli A, Lipina SJ, Olesinska A. Explicit and implicit issues in the developmental cognitive neuroscience of social inequality. Front Hum Neurosci. 2012;6:254. doi:10.3389/fnhum.2012.00254.
  12. Schwab JF, Lew-Williams C. Language learning, socioeconomic status, and child-directed speech. Wiley Interdiscip Rev Cogn Sci. 2016;7(4):264–75. doi:10.1002/wcs.1393.
  13. Rakesh D, Zalesky A, Whittle S. Assessment of parent income and education, neighborhood disadvantage, and child brain structure. JAMA Netw Open. 2022;5(8):e2226208. doi:10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2022.26208.
  14. Ursache A, Noble KG; Pediatric Imaging, Neurocognition and Genetics Study. Socioeconomic status, white matter, and executive function in children. Brain Behav. 2016;6(10):e00531. doi:10.1002/brb3.531.
  15. Johnson SB, Riis JL, Noble KG. State of the art review: Poverty and the developing brain. Pediatrics. 2016;137(4):e20153075. doi:10.1542/peds.2015-3075.
  16. Murtha K, Larsen B, Pines A, Parkes L, Moore TM, Adebimpe A, et al. Associations between neighborhood socioeconomic status, parental education, and executive system activation in youth. Cereb Cortex. 2023;33(4):1058–73. doi:10.1093/cercor/bhac120.
  17. Rosen ML, Sheridan MA, Sambrook KA, Meltzoff AN, McLaughlin KA. Socioeconomic disparities in academic achievement: A multi-modal investigation of neural mechanisms in children and adolescents. Neuroimage. 2018;173:298–310. doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2018.02.043.
  18. Tooley UA, Bassett DS, Mackey AP. Environmental influences on the pace of brain development. Nat Rev Neurosci. 2021;22(6):372–84. doi:10.1038/s41583-021-00457-5.
  19. Judd N, Sauce B, Wiedenhoeft J, Tromp J, Chaarani B, Schliep A, et al. Cognitive and brain development is independently influenced by socioeconomic status and polygenic scores for educational attainment. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2020;117(22):12411–8. doi:10.1073/pnas.2001228117.
  20. Weinberg D, Stevens GWJM, Finkenauer C, Brunekreef B, Smit HA, Wijga AH. The pathways from parental and neigh-bourhood socioeconomic status to adolescent educational attainment: An examination of the role of cognitive ability, teacher assessment, and educational expectations. PLoS One. 2019;14(5):e0216803. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0216803.
  21. Cuartas J, Hanno E, Lesaux NK, Jones SM. Executive function, self-regulation skills, behaviors, and socioeconomic status in early childhood. PLoS One. 2022;17(11):e0277013. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0277013.
  22. Janus M, Brownell M, Reid-Westoby C, Pottruff M, Forer B, Guhn M, et al. Neighbourhood-level socioeconomic status and prevalence of teacher-reported health disorders among Canadian kindergarten children. Front Public Health. 2024;11:1295195. doi:10.3389/fpubh.2023.1295195.
  23. Moorman SM, Carr K, Greenfield EA. Childhood socioeconomic status and genetic risk for poorer cognition in later life. Soc Sci Med. 2018;212:219–26. doi:10.1016/j.socscimed.2018.07.025.
  24. Chen Q, Kong Y, Gao W, Mo L. Effects of socioeconomic status, parent-child relationship, and learning motivation on reading ability. Front Psychol. 2018;9:1297. doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2018.01297.
  25. Zhao X, Wang Y, Maes JHR. The effect of working memory capacity and training on intertemporal decision making in children from low-socioeconomic-status families. J Exp Child Psychol. 2022;216:105347. doi:10.1016/j.jecp.2021.105347.
  26. Mooney KE, Pickett KE, Shire K, Allen RJ, Waterman AH. Socioeconomic disadvantage and ethnicity are associated with large differences in children's working memory ability: analysis of a prospective birth cohort study following 13,500 children. BMC Psychol. 2022;10(1):67. doi:10.1186/s40359-022-00773-0.
  27. Poon K, Ho MSH, Chou KL. Executive functions as mediators between socioeconomic status and academic performance in Chinese school-aged children. Heliyon. 2022;8(10):e11121. doi:10.1016/j.heliyon.2022.e11121.
  28. Duval ER, Garfinkel SN, Swain JE, Evans GW, Blackburn EK, Angstadt M, et al. Childhood poverty is associated with altered hippocampal function and visuospatial memory in adulthood. Dev Cogn Neurosci. 2017;23:39–44. doi:10.1016/j.dcn.2016.11.006.
  29. Wang J, Geng L. Effects of socioeconomic status on physical and psychological health: Lifestyle as a mediator. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2019;16(2):281. doi:10.3390/ijerph16020281.
  30. Hackman DA, Farah MJ, Meaney MJ. Socioeconomic status and the brain: mechanistic insights from human and animal research. Nat Rev Neurosci. 2010;11(9):651–9.
  31. Barakat C, Konstantinidis T. A review of the relationship between socioeconomic status change and health. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2023;20(13):6249. doi:10.3390/ijerph20136249.
  32. Moitra M, Owens S, Hailemariam M, Wilson KS, Mensa-Kwao A, Gonese G, et al. Global mental health: Where we are and where we are going. Curr Psychiatry Rep. 2023;25(7):301–11.
  33. Shao Y, Ying H, Li X, Tong L. Association between socioeconomic status and mental health among China's migrant workers: A moderated mediation model. PLoS One. 2022;17(9):e0274669. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0274669.
  34. Nguyen AM, Kim Y, Abramson DM. Neighborhood socioeconomic status and women's mental health: A longitudinal study of Hurricane Katrina survivors, 2005–2015. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2023;20(2):925. doi:10.3390/ijerph20020925
  35. Robinette JW, Charles ST, Gruenewald TL. Neighborhood socioeconomic status and health: A longitudinal analysis. J Community Health. 2017;42(5):865–71. doi:10.1007/s10900-017-0327-6.
  36. Collins PY, Sinha M, Concepcion T, Patton G, Way T, McCay L, Mensa-Kwao A, Herrman H, de Leeuw E, Anand N, Atwoli L, Bardikoff N, et al. Making cities mental health friendly for adolescents and young adults. Nature. 2024;627(8002):137–48.
  37. Weinberg D, Stevens GWJM, Duinhof EL, Finkenauer C. Adolescent socioeconomic status and mental health inequalities in the Netherlands, 2001–2017. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2019;16(19):3605. doi:10.3390/ijerph16193605.
  38. Yang D, Hu S, Li M. The influence of family socioeconomic status on adolescents' mental health in China. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022;19(13):7824. doi:10.3390/ijerph19137824.
  39. Reiss F, Meyrose AK, Otto C, Lampert T, Klasen F, Ravens-Sieberer U. Socioeconomic status, stressful life situations and mental health problems in children and adolescents: Results of the German BELLA cohort-study. PLoS One. 2019;14(3):e0213700. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0213700.
  40. Jakobsen AL, Jørgensen A, Tølbøll L, Johnsen SB. Opening the black box of the relationship between neighborhood socio-economic status and mental health: Neighborhood social-interactive characteristics as contextual mechanisms. Health Place. 2022;77:102905. doi:10.1016/j.healthplace.2022.102905.
  41. Brito NH, Piccolo LR, Noble KG; Pediatric Imaging, Neurocognition, and Genetics Study. Associations between cortical thickness and neurocognitive skills during childhood vary by family socioeconomic factors. Brain Cogn. 2017;116:54–62. doi:10.1016/j.bandc.2017.03.007.

Most read articles by the same author(s)

1 2 > >>